The answer's at the bottom.
They want to be free to build (i.e. develop). And, by the way, preserving Napa Valley for generations means saving the hillsides as well.
BULLETINTo: Winery PrincipalsFrom: NVV Board of DirectorsSubject: NVV Board Takes Position on Napa County Watershed and Oak Woodland Protection Initiative of 2018Date: January 11, 2018
Following several months of gathering member input, including a January 4 study session attended by more than 80 vintners and a meeting of our Industry Issues Committee, the NVV Board of Directors today voted unanimously to oppose the Napa County Watershed and Oak Woodland Protection Initiative of 2018.The board made the decision for the following reasons:
- The initiative, as written, is legally uncertain. The board believes there may be unintended consequences for agriculture if it becomes law.
- The fires have reminded us of the delicacy of our environment and there is ambiguity as to how the oaks that were burned or damaged by them would factor into the initiative.
- The majority of input the board received from members conveyed opposition.The board also noted there are a number of members who are in favor of the initiative and it recognizes the diversity of member opinion. However, for all the reasons stated above, it is appropriate to oppose it.In addition to today’s vote, the NVV is prepared to put resources toward an opposition campaign and formed a task force that will meet immediately to help determine its involvement.The board confirmed the NVV’s mission to promote, protect and enhance the Napa Valley and remains committed to advocating for the local wine industry while preserving the Napa Valley for future generations.
And, by the way, the vote was not unanimous. So what should right-minded vintners - and there are plenty - do?