Thursday, October 6, 2016

An imperfect score

                                     Bunny Foo Foo (really)                                         

    Craig and Kathryn Hall are about to publish a semi-promotional book called A Perfect Score (“The art, soul, and business of a 21st-century winery”). Some of their fellow writers at Center Street Books, an imprint of mega-Hachette, are Newt Gingrich and Paul Rand, which gives you some idea of the modus operandi, which includes vanity publishing.
   This offering to reviewers is so light-weight you have to tie it to the toilet handle to prevent it drifting away, starting with the revelation that the 3,000-pound chrome monster rabbit outside HALL Winery is officially named Bunny Foo Foo and was made in China.
   The collective husband-wife scribes go on to tell us that, “despite homegrown political complications" - meaning citizens making their voices heard - "we love it here. What’s not to love about a region with an eclectic group of farmers, winemakers, marketers, business folks, artists, and more, all joined together by the appreciation of fine wine, and of living and working in this beautiful place? Oh, and awesome weather.”
Weekends begin when they “jump in the convertible with our two little Cavalier King Charles spaniels, and head toward our favorite trail-head… By the time we reach the outskirts of Calistoga at 8:30 or 9 a.m., they’re ready to romp. The four of us hit the trail. As we wind our way up the hill and look south, the Valley stretches out in front of us like a sprawling vine. We keep climbing and before long we’re so deep into the forest that we can no longer hear the sounds from the Valley or see anything but pines, laurels, and oaks, their branches intertwined and draped in vines. What a fantastic way to start the day!”
Apparently they don’t hike at Walt Ranch in eastern Napa, where close to 30,000 trees are slated for removal. “Our latest experience with trying to plant vineyards on a Napa piece of property we own is a good example of this bitter division and the difficulty in finding balance. In 2005 we bought a 2,300-acre parcel of land zoned for agricultural use called the Miranda Leonard Ranch [now Walt Ranch] , a stunning property with some views that actually extend 50 miles to the Golden Gate Bridge. We hoped that the vineyard potential would match its beauty.”
    But “because part of the parcel on which we wanted to plant vines was at a grade above 5 percent, we were required to do an Erosion Control Plan (ECP). The property is also large, so an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was mandated.” These, “it turns out, are complex documents written by experts hired by the county and paid for by the landowner. The purpose of these documents is to analyze the property in order to ensure that the overall project will not adversely affect the environment. At the time, California guidelines specified that EIRs should take one year. Naively we didn’t think that would be a big deal. As we write this ten years later, the county in its role as reviewing agency has yet to complete the final EIR.
    “We knew from the start that water would be an important issue. That didn’t seem like it would be a problem when two water experts reported that we had one of the best water areas in the Valley, with a minimum of 1.4 billion gallons of water—and much more likely 3.6 billion gallons—under our property. Our erosion control plans were similarly positive. It turned out that the development would actually help the quality of the city’s water, which is downright uncommon.”
    Incredible, in fact.
    “Nevertheless, our neighbors were decidedly displeased…At the Napa County planning director’s public meeting on November 24, 2014, tensions had rocketed to an all-time high. The hearing room overflowed with 80 to 100 people, many holding HALT WALT placards and wearing HALT WALT buttons. In July of that same year, the draft EIR, all 1,500 pages, had been released and groups quickly formed to oppose the project. Although no public meeting on a vineyard had ever been held, a decision was made to hold one about Walt Ranch.”
    The county had asked Craig Hall to speak. “He could have saved his breath… Tensions were high. One man came up to where Kathryn was sitting and leaned down real close. ‘You’re the devil,’ he announced… The next morning, a dead bunny appeared in the entrance of our St. Helena winery.”
    As the Halls see it, the core questions dividing the valley are “how do we preserve the natural beauty…, support the industry that supports Napa, manage tourism, and continue to sustain good jobs and infrastructure for our community? And can the Agricultural Preserve that the county adopted in 1968 be sustained in Napa Valley given the fact that wineries now increasingly want to sell direct to consumer, which means being tourist oriented?”
    They thus make the assumption that "event centers" are necessary, which is far from true. The “hopeful solutions” suggested are woefully inadequate and unrealistic, and they seem unaware that the Ag Preserve and the Ag Watershed are  quite different things, the latter being the most vulnerable to their own development plans.
    “Like it or not, Napa Valley is a magnet that draws people to her. So the question we really need to be asking is, How do we grow in a way that honors the Valley’s beauty and agriculture? This overly rigid protection of the Ag Preserve and agricultural zoning against any development—including agricultural cultivation, which is exactly what the Ag Preserve was designed to protect—invites litigation that ultimately could lead to the elimination of the Ag Preserve altogether. The truth is that by not allowing people to actually do agriculture in the Ag Preserve, extremists are putting the Ag Preserve in peril.”
    The fact is that no one is trying to prevent agriculture in the agricultural preserve, whose greatest enemy is tourism. That and real estate development have indeed put everything in peril, with the exception, of course, of Bunny Foo Foo.
                                                  *                                      
To order my book about the loss of American place go to:





Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Rare baby steelhead susceptible to vineyard development

A recent study commissioned by Forests Unlimited surprisingly discovered infant rainbow trout and other vital wildlife in Napa's Conn Creek, downstream of yet another proposed new vineyard. This one's being challenged by environmentalists.  (Excerpts and photos below from the report by Patrick Higgins.)
                                               


                                            
    Historic accounts (Ott 1945, Cox 1979, Leidy et al. 2005) indicate that Conn Creek was meeting cold water beneficial uses from its headwaters downstream to the Napa River, but today it is dry in reaches above Angwin, stagnant and warm in town and only attains cold water ecosystem functionality below Howell Mountain Road. The reason that Conn Creek adjacent to the project has maintained flow and resident trout is because the underlying volcanic terrain and Cold Springs that gives rise to year around very cold water flows that would now be extracted for watering the Le Colline Vineyard. 
    The City of Napa relies on Lake Hennessey that is downstream on Conn Creek and it is concerned about impacts to water quality there from developments such as the one proposed. Allowing wildland hydrology to be disrupted without limit will eventually cause the reservoir to reach a tipping point and to develop noxious or even toxic algae blooms. Cold water coming into the reservoir year around would tend to moderate algae blooms and could promote stratification so that rainbow trout could survive at depths during summer. The Lake Hennessey turbidity data provided in the DEIR actually shows an increase in summer turbidity during recent drought years that may be indicative of increased phytoplankton and the onset of eutrophication. 
    The proponent of the project (DiCesaris 2016) states that “agriculture is the highest and best use of Napa County land.” Some wild lands need to be left undisturbed in order for society to have access to clean water, which is more essential than wine. Also, leaving some areas for the animals to live is also a key tenet of good stewardship and has practical value to humans. If we destroy the ecosystem on which the animals rely, we lose “ecosystem services” such as bats controlling insects that can attack our crops and be vectors for diseases; and foxes, coyotes, and raptors controlling rodents and keep them reaching plague proportions. 
    Urban and suburban development, proliferation of vineyards and other nearby development have pushed Conn Creek to near its tipping point and local wildlife populations are being impacted by habitat loss that could lead to loss of species diversity. The connectivity of the Le Colline project area to the Linda Falls Preserve, the properties unique geologic features, and its diverse wildlife make it much more appropriate for a conservation easement than vineyard development in keeping with the Napa County General Plan.                                             


                                                       *
 To order my novel, Nose, click on:  
http://www.amazon.com/Nose-Novel-James-Conaway/dp/1250006848/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1362180145&sr=1-1&keywords=nose                                      



Sunday, October 2, 2016

Always water

More from Napa's citizen investigator:                                                           

                                               The Private I             


    Under Federal law, Public Corruption occurs not just from taking bribes or providing excessive services to a constituent, but from engaging in a pattern of violating land use laws over a long period of time, depriving citizens of honest government. Is any kind of action on-going to hold Bill Dodd et al responsible for such a thing?
    I DO NOT KNOW ANY SPECIFICS, ONLY THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHAEL MUKASEY HAS SAID THERE ARE PUBLIC CORRUPTION PROBES IN SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA.  SEVERAL TIMES THERE WERE ADS ON LOCAL TELEVISION WITH A TOLL FREE NUMBER WITH THE FBI FOR PEOPLE TO REPORT PUBLIC CORRUPTION.  INVESTIGATIONS ARE HIGHLY SECRET AND ACCORDING TO ATTORNEY GENERAL MUKASEY, FEDERAL GRAND JURIES ARE ASSISTING.  
    Somehow I think Bill Dodd's efforts to change California's Government Codes, signed into law last October, was a way for Dodd to argue having these changes are essential to supply water to people during droughts - was it illegal before to transport bottle water to places like Capell Valley? - while it has a different reason underlying, which is "growth inducing" to help people like Craig Hall. After all, Dodd was a Republican and in order to get campaign support for run for a seat the Assembly, he had to CHANGE his registration to Democrat.

Friday, September 30, 2016

Is Fish Friendly LandSmart enough?

This letter's in response to an earlier one (see Sept. 26 post) by an environmental activist deploring the effects of widespread tree-cutting in the hills. The questions that remain are: if so much is being done, why isn't the Napa River in better shape, and how much political cover is being provided indirectly by claims like this for business as usual in the hills?                                                   

                     
From the Napa Register:


As we near the end of another harvest season, I ask myself, what’s different today than nearly 15 years ago in the way that vineyard properties are managed? Today, unpaved roads are being maintained to protect water quality, stream sides are being restored to provide shade and habitat, fish barriers are being removed, and water use is being more carefully monitored on site.
Nearly 15 years ago, a small handful of growers throughout Napa County were involved in this type of stewardship. Today, over 45 percent of vineyards and over 72,000 acres of land are being managed in a way to protect water quality, enhance stream habitat, and efficiently use local water supplies.
The Napa Green Certified Land program, developed in 2002 by a diverse group of over 20 stakeholders representing environmental and agricultural interests, helped propel stewardship to the next level.
Napa Green is a program where growers receive technical assistance from the Fish Friendly Farming and LandSmart programs to evaluate their property and then develop and implement a conservation plan that includes a site-specific set of beneficial management practices to protect and enhance the natural resources on their property. The plan is certified by independent third-party local, state and federal agencies with qualifications and responsibilities to protect water quality and endangered species.
Guided by professionals--experts in hydrology, fisheries biology, fluvial geomorphology, riparian restoration, erosion and sediment control, agronomy--Napa Green participants are hands-on environmental leaders working through the LandSmart and Fish Friendly Farming programs. They are implementing watershed-wide erosion reduction projects on unpaved roads in tributaries that are critical to threatened steelhead trout.
They have worked with the Napa County Resource Conservation District to remove fish migration barriers in the Napa River watershed, providing improved access to high quality habitat in local tributaries. They implement practices to evaluate and improve their water use efficiency for irrigation and frost protection. They are leaders in several reach-scale restoration projects on the Napa River and in the Bear Creek, Bale Slough, and Carneros Creek watersheds. They are working together, parcel by parcel, to manage their land in a way that is mindful of their stewardship responsibilities.


Pause
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time0:00
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
0:00
Fullscreen
00:00
Unmute
Over 15 years ago, diverse stakeholders came together to discuss common goals related to improving the health of the Napa River. We talked about difficult issues, we didn’t always agree, we worked to find common ground, we agreed to a program, Napa Green, that would help growers and vintners meet shared environmental goals. The process wasn’t driven by regulations or the ballot box – the process was driven by a shared interest in protecting a special place, a place we call home, a place we work, a place we love: the Napa Valley.
There are pressing environmental issues, no doubt. Today, we’d be well-served to think about how we can best work together, like we did 15 years ago, to find common ground and address our shared challenges to meet our shared interests. Anything else will serve only to fragment our community and dissipate constructive conservation efforts.
Leigh Sharp, executive director
Napa County Resource Conservation District

Thursday, September 29, 2016

Growing old illegally?

Here begins a series of occasional correspondence with a Napa County resident uncommonly knowledgeable both politically and historically. Her work reaches all the way into the halls of justice in Washington, D.C. , and though I can't vouch for all of it, I do find her work valuable and interesting, and she herself a fine example of engaged citizenship.

                                          The Private I
                                                    


    This recent industrial accident in the Ag Preserve south of Yountville, investigated by the Sheriff's Department, reveals - as does the wine's label - that a generic California wine is being aged in the Ag Preserve.  The wines contain no local fruit and - generic wines can only be produced in the industrial area south of Napa.
    Little by little more and more "label operations" with faux fronts are destroying our ag preserve, using our precious water, adding commercial traffic and more tourists to our roads, while operating as illegitimates.  It's consumer deception, even though bottles are properly labeled California Wine vs. Napa Valley.  
    While the Sheriff can investigate the death, only costly civil actions can restore our blessed valley.  Think of this as a label operation for Sutter Home Winery capitalizing on a local name, after they were chased out of th Ag Preserve years ago.
                                                
A reader responds:
    Afraid your source is way off. Of course, "generic" wines are legally produced as well as aged all over the AP. They just must be correctly labeled (and there's the rub). There is no legal requirement for ANY pre-WDO winery to use ANY county fruit - it can all be "generic" and that is millions of gallons.
    And if they were using Napa fruit pre-WDO they have no requirement to continue to do so nor any requirement to reveal their sources. So, if they were producing a million gallons Napa wine pre-WDO, they can shift that volume to all non-Napa fruit (or bulk wine), nothing prevents that.
    In fact, they can apply for an expansion, claim that they were crushing Napa fruit pre-WDO (no proof needed), "shift" the numbers of that "Napa fruit" to meet the 75% requirement of their post-WDO expansion and never reveal their sources. This is the "source shifting" that so concerned Andy with Raymond's expansion. Big fight over this a few years ago with NVV - they won, of course.
    Only wineries approved or expanded post-WDO are required to use 75% Napa fruit - they can process up to 25% of their production in non-Napa fruit and that can also be millions of gallons of "generic" wine.
    Airport Industrial and within certain city limits (Napa): there is no requirement for any winery to use any Napa fruit but those are not the only locations legally producing and/or "aging" "generic" wines. So there is no "there" there…
    The "there" is in the fact that altho NVV polices the use of "Napa Valley" on NEW label applications - no one monitors what is IN the bottle. There are no requirements for wineries to reveal the source of their grapes in any Federal TTB reporting - and TTB is supposed to control the use of appellations (working on this but on hold for harvest).
    No one monitors the 75% sourcing in NC either - unless
selected for audit - and now NVV has convinced county to do "mandatory" reporting that can't be verified to anything because no one tracks it - all very clever.
    Shhh at this time - but there is a really big story here that no o
ne is looking at - it's not what's ON the label, but what's IN the bottle (EVEN if legal by current regs).
   The source is right that the Joel Gott operation is suspect - but may be totally within regs which allow and promote consumer deception.


    


Monday, September 26, 2016

The outer life of trees

                    This letter pretty much sums it up:                                                     
    

From the Napa Valley Register:      

  Program Is Covering Up for Deforestation

Have you ever heard of the story behind the story. The full story of the Napa Valley Vintner's programs that helps preserve fish habitat needs better context to the history, causes and environmental degradation of the Napa River. It can be mostly summarized in one word -- deforestation.
Since prime agricultural lands on the valley floor were converted to vines (large swaths of forest removed for vines) by the 1950s, the expansion of vines has been in the forested mountains surrounding the Napa Valley and through streams that flow to the Napa River that have been sadly dewatered and denuded for vines.
American Canyon, Suscol, Carneros, Milliken, Kimbal and Bell creeks are tributaries out of over 56 that still have dry season flows to the Napa River. You cannot have fish without water. Shame on us for not protecting flows to the Napa River, which now runs mostly dry throughout the fresh water portions of the river. Groundwater continues to decline and deforestation for yet more vines continues at an alarming pace, destroying what is left of Northern Spotted Owl, mountain lion, red-legged frog, Chinook and steelhead habitats, i.e. Walt Ranch soon to deforest 24,000 trees in the best creek and public reservoir watershed, Milliken Creek.
The wine industry is tapping into multi-million dollar grant opportunities (our tax dollars) to restore private rich property owners' riparian lands (Rutherford Dust) because the Napa River storm water is exceeding levees (to protect vines) carving a new channels through valley vines.
Why is this happening? It is happening largely due to deforestation on slopes. Healthy rivers flood their plains but levees disconnect the rivers from flood plains.
In the Napa Valley, levees were primarily created to protect vines from flooding. For the last 30 years, slope deforestation and vineyard erosion control plans pipe water off the mountain vineyards and discharge the storm water into the creeks causing increased rated of flows into the Napa River exceeding the levees. Hence, high velocity storm waters (jumped levees) are destroying rich valley land owner's vines.

No worries for the rich because the taxpayers are paying for their new levees while all the agencies are ignoring the cause of the levee breaches such as levees themselves, deforestation and increased rate of runoff from mountain vineyard developments. What a colossal failure of the public trust to restore the Napa River.
The PR for this “restoration” provides environmental cover for an industry that ignore the true causes of our environmental problems here in Napa County. Check out the most recent levee work at Yountville crossroads. Let's understand that the rich property owners are not donating their lands, but rather they are desperately fighting to try and regain control of floodwaters that are destroying their vines. Now, the new levees have to be set back onto their lands.
Why are taxpayers having to pay for the impacts of an industry that is silent on their deforestation practices, which is the major cause of valley floor levee breaches? Then they have the audacity to call their industry Green Certified. Our glamorous wine industry is green washing a nasty underbelly of deforestation for feel-good restoration.
Chris Malan

Saturday, September 10, 2016

Nature in glass

                                                                             

My daughter, Susanna , a glass artist living in Berkeley (feralstudio.com), wants to donate a portion of the proceeds from her diverse genres (https://www.etsy.com/shop/FeralStudio) to a good environmental cause in northern California. There are so many good ones. Please send suggestions.

                                                                             

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Like ten million matchsticks

   California Oaks Stand Ready to Burn
      (from The New York Times)
                                 By Cynthia H. Craft



Photo



INVERNESS, Calif. — At the height of California’s fierce wildfire season, the Sierra Nevada and North Coast forests are choked with tens of millions of dead and dying trees, from gnarly oaks to elegant pines that are turning leafy chapels into tinderboxes of highly combustible debris.
Ground crews wielding chain saws, axes and wood chippers are braving the intense summer heat in the Sierra’s lower elevations, where most of the pine trees have died. The devastation and danger are greatest in the central and southern Sierra Nevada, where the estimated number of dead trees since 2010 is a staggering 66 million.
Scientists say rarely is one culprit to blame for the escalation in the state’s tree deaths, and the resulting fire hazard. Rather, destruction on such a broad scale is nearly always the result of a complex convergence of threats to forest ecosystems.
Chief among them is a severe, sustained drought in the Sierra Nevada that is stressing trees and disabling their natural defenses. Climate change is raising temperatures, making for warmer winters. No longer kept in check by winter’s freeze, bark beetle populations are growing. Separately, a nonnative, potent plant pathogen is thriving in the moist areas of the North Coast, introduced to California soil by global trade. Opportunistic fungi are standing by, ready to finish the kill.
Factor in human shortcomings — poor or absent forest management, a failure to clear out ignitable dead wood, the darker temptation of arson, unchecked carelessness — and you have a lethal recipe.
“It’s never just one thing that brings down trees,” said David Rizzo, the chairman of plant pathology at the University of California, Davis. “It’s always a combination. The first may weaken trees; the next stresses trees over time. Then comes a third, shutting down the trees’ immune and defense systems. Finally, the last may come along to disrupt nutrient systems. When all this happens at once, or in rapid succession, trees are no longer able to save themselves.”
Two of California’s prized forest regions are in failing health because such conditions have stacked the odds against them. In the Sierra Nevada, the losses of pines and other conifers are concentrated and widening.
Along the North Coast, a picturesque blink of a town called Inverness and the surrounding Marin County woodlands are “ground zero,” Dr. Rizzo said, for the mysterious plant pathogen that began infesting coast oaks probably as far back as the mid-1980s.
It took years of research — detective work, really — before experts like Dr. Rizzo and Matteo Garbelotto, a professor of environmental science policy and management at the University of California, Berkeley, discerned that the funguslike pathogen had infested coast oaks years before their showy demise.
Dr. Rizzo estimated that five million to 10 million coastal trees had died because of sudden oak death.
A related pathogen, Phytophthora infestans, was responsible for the Great Potato Famine in Ireland in the mid-1800s.
In Marin County, home to some of California’s priciest land, sudden oak death spread onto such landmark properties as George Lucas’s Skywalker Ranch and the renowned Spirit Rock Meditation Center. The pathogen has taken hold as far south as Big Sur, a rugged, misty stretch of Highway 1 with a bohemian flavor to its exclusive community.
On a recent, sun-dappled afternoon in Inverness, Dr. Rizzo looked to the sky and noted, “Big Sur is burning.” The same gray, coarse woody debris that Dr. Rizzo had just pointed out to visitors had accumulated in the woods not far from Big Sur.
Sudden oak death thrives in the moist, cool climate of the North Coast. Dr. Rizzo is investigating whether it moves through streams as well.
Near the Oregon border, the Native American Yurok and Hoopa Valleytribes are participating in Dr. Rizzo’s research, periodically checking bags of leaves retrieved from streams for signs of disease. “Culturally, the tanoak are very important to Native Americans,” he said.
Katie Harrell, a spokeswoman for the nonprofit California Oak Mortality Task Force, said Native Americans mourned the death of trees in their habitat. “Trees are part of their holy lands,” Ms. Harrell said. “They break down in tears talking about the loss of trees as family members.”

CreditGabrielle Lurie for The New York Times 
No one knows exactly where Phytophthora ramorum first showed up in California, but Dr. Rizzo said the pathogen was probably a stowaway aboard a shipment of imported nursery plants.
What is known is that alarm over dying oaks has instilled in coastal residents a new esprit de corps. Armed with GPS devices, envelopes and markers, crews of citizen scientists respond to Dr. Garbelotto’s call for seasonal “blitzes.” Volunteers scour wooded areas for signs of the disease. Upon coming across a tree with blighted leaves, they note the coordinates, collect samples and send them to a laboratory for identification.
The pathogen spreads by rain splash. The forest’s Typhoid Mary is the bay laurel tree, a faithful host for the disease but one that never succumbs to its perils.
When rain falls on bay laurel leaves, contaminated droplets scatter, reaching neighboring trees. If those neighbors are coast oaks or tanoaks, the pathogen penetrates bark with ease and establishes residence. At the end of outstretched filaments too small for the naked eye to see, the pest launches lethal spores that sap the tree of its nutrients. Native fungi follow, as do pests. Within a couple of years, the tree is dead.
Millions of coastal oaks have died that way. Interest in sudden oak death has taken on a life of its own, with the Sixth Sudden Oak Death Symposium this year drawing scientists from around the world. Dr. Rizzo and others are growing more concerned that, as tanoaks spread in Northern California’s iconic redwood forests, sudden oak death will follow. Because tanoaks quickly fall to the disease, the danger of fire fed by dead wood will rise and the redwood ecosystem may be damaged.
Already, researchers have detected the killer pathogen among redwoods in Humboldt Redwoods State Park, along the Avenue of the Giants, a 31-mile route through the world’s largest stand of virgin redwoods.

Pho

 
Dr. Rizzo’s lab is monitoring 600 forest plots of 500 square meters each. According to his website, researchers will periodically visit the plots, and “every tree and shrub will be assessed for presence of pathogen(s).”
Dr. Garbelotto is experimenting to see if a preventive treatment he is applying to vulnerable trees will ward off sudden oak death.
On the other side of California, the tree die-off in the Sierra Nevada continues to worry firefighters and public officials. Under stress in the fifth year of severe drought, the ponderosa pines, the pinyons and the sugar pines lack the moisture needed to manufacture the sticky resin that prevents bark beetles from burrowing into their trunks. With nothing to stop the voracious pests — no bigger than a grain of rice — they bore into the pines, where they produce larvae. In turn, the larvae feed off the trees’ nutrients, and the tall, proud pines die in place, standing upright like matchsticks waiting for a light.
The official count of dead trees, taken by United States Forest Serviceand California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection officials during flights over the Sierra Nevada, is almost certain to grow. More are being spotted from the air in the Lake Tahoe Basin and farther north.
Neither of the two enormous die-offs seems to be ending anytime soon, and the Big Sur blaze is still burning — with more than 90,000 acres destroyed.
When hit with fire like this, many forests return only as scrubland, with trees no bigger than shrubs.
Gov. Jerry Brown of California issued emergency declarations for the Sierra’s central and southern regions last October. Mr. Brown also called for a task force to devise strategies to clear the forests of deadwood. He also sought additional federal funds.
In that pursuit, he received an assist from Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, who as overseer of the Forest Service predicted disaster if Congress failed to allocate much more money for preventive forest management.
“Tree die-offs of this magnitude are unprecedented and increase the risk of catastrophic wildfires that put property and lives at risk,” Mr. Vilsack said earlier this summer. “We must fund wildfire suppression like other natural disasters in the country.”

                                                                *
                                                               
To order my novel, Nose, click on:  


Friday, August 26, 2016

An up-dated publisher's bio

                       
    
     James Conaway is working on the last volume of his Napa trilogy, a social narrative written with novelistic conventions. An early chapter was recently published in The American Scholar (https://theamericanscholar.org/waiting-for-fire/) and the magazine also produced a podcast that can heard at https://theamericanscholar.org/go-west-young-scholar/?utm_source=email#.V6RyARQlfR0.
    A former Wallace Stegner Fellow at Stanford University and a recipient of the Alicia Patterson Journalism Fellowship, Jim was the former editor-in-chief of Preservation magazine and is the author of three novels - The Big Easy (Houghton), World’s End, (Morrow) and Nose (St Martin’s), about the California wine world from which he has reported for many years.
    He’s the author of ten books of non-fiction, including The Far Side of Eden: Old Land, New Money and the Battle for Napa Valley, a Washington Post Best Book of the Year in 2002 described in the New York Times Book Review as "an important story, emblematic of our time." Of the best-selling book that preceded it, Napa: The Story of an American Eden, Frank Prial wrote in the New York Times: "fascinating... Conaway is a reporter with a Saroyan-like sense of humor and a Balzac-like eye for detail.”
His other books include The Forgotten Fifties: America’s Decade from the Archives of Look Magazine (Library of Congress/Rizzoli 2014); the essay collection, Vanishing America: In Search of Our Elusive Landscapes (Counterpoint); a memoir, Memphis Afternoons, (Houghton Mifflin) reviewed in the Washington Post by Jim Lehrer who wrote, "Conaway moves through his family and life in Memphis in the '40s and '50s with the flow and grace of an impressionist painter”; and The Kingdom in the Country, a personal journey through the public lands of the American West described by Wallace Stegner as "a very lively book... He got into places and activities that most westerners never even get close to." The late Jim Harrison called it "a wonderful and well-considered evocation of the New West."
Jim has written for many magazines during a long and varied writing career, including the New York Times Magazine, the Atlantic Monthly, the New Republic, Harper's, Smithsonian, National Geographic Traveler, and Outside. His op-ed pieces have appeared in the New York Times and the Washington Post.


                        *                     
                    
To order my novel, Nose, click on: